Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10
61
General Discussion / Re: Immediate Recommendations for Change
« Last post by Anon on April 29, 2014, 03:24:18 am »
Safety standards. I know Norris has these, but even so, I have seen some terrifying sets and unsafe fight choreo and movement that made me fear for actor safety. Whatever is in place isn't enough.

*Edit: Also, just wondering, but who has the power to actually make these changes and how do we ensure that these recommendations are reaching their ears? Right now this just feels a bit futile and indulgent.
62
General Discussion / Re: Closer bonds between Theatre and RTVF?
« Last post by Anon on April 29, 2014, 03:21:56 am »
I joined the forum to comment on this.

I agree, and upon thinking about the problem, it seems at first a very difficult gap to bridge. The first issue that strikes me is that Theatre and RTVF just don't get a lot of opportunities to meet, talk and actually understand what the other does. There are very few doubles because of the SoC restrictions, and most RTVF and Theatre classes aren't open to non-majors, which means, in my experience, one just doesn't meet enough of the other major.

There's also the non-trivial fact that theatre and film require different skill sets, and the acting, lighting and set for one does not always translate to the other--it requires a kind of implicit understanding about the nuanced differences between the two forms that is never really explicated. Although I would love to see more tech people coming from RTVF to theatre and more actors trying RTVF.

From inside the theatre major, it feels like doing film doesn't have the same social capital as being in a show does, even though getting footage for your reel is probably more career-beneficial. There's a lot of pressure to be doing Theatre And Only Theatre, because nothing else is really visible in the community, which is a shame.

I guess, as lovely as this sounds, these are just the issues that need to be resolved, not to mention the colossal effort it would take to get such a massive dialogue and awareness going between the two majors.

Is there a StuCo equivalent in RTVF? A group that sort of unites and mediates most/some of the student work that gets produced?
63
General Discussion / Re: The Culture of Casting/Petitioning
« Last post by emilymartin on April 29, 2014, 01:36:57 am »
To reiterate what Alex and Hale have said - I desperately wish there were not so much public celebration of new members of boards on facebook, ESPECIALLY for the sanity of freshmen who already feel unsure footing in the NU theatre community (which was all of us? most of us?). I doubt it would decrease the warm welcome that the new board members deserve to not broadcast it to the so freshly declined.
64
General Discussion / Re: The Role of Mental Health in Stuco
« Last post by hannahfisher on April 29, 2014, 12:39:04 am »
Hey guys!
Let's try to talk about ways to move forward without calling out shows. I say this simply to keep the conversation positive and productive rather than critical in an unkind way. Totally hear what you're saying, though, and this feedback is really helpful!
65
General Discussion / Re: The Culture of Casting/Petitioning
« Last post by BeccaEhl on April 29, 2014, 12:25:08 am »
Is there a way to lower the stakes for petitioning without crushing the enthusiasm that boards have? It's great that the StuCo boards are so jazzed about getting board members, but there's a sense that being on a board is the ultimate StuCo experience - and not everyone is going to get on a board. Is it possible to present petitions differently so that people can still get excited about them, but there's less of a tone of "THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A THEATRE MAJOR"?
66
General Discussion / Could someone explain what Waa-2 is to me?
« Last post by halemcsharry on April 29, 2014, 12:15:44 am »
It's a little detached now but I'd think to bring it up before it comes back in the fall- what is the deal with Waa-2?

It was frustrating as a freshman because, only a week into our first quarter, it seemed to create a new upper class of freshman performers. Long before musical theatre certificate program auditions are on the radar, there's already a faction of MT kids. It seems like a really bad idea to divide the freshman class as soon as they arrive.

Does anyone have any insight?
67
General Discussion / Re: The Role of Mental Health in Stuco
« Last post by ahitzhusen on April 29, 2014, 12:14:29 am »
I didn't go to Bug because of the blood. Nor did I go to Next to Normal (was warned not to go by my roommate).
I did go to Marat/Sade and wished I hadn't. I spent the entire second half hiding in the back row of the theatre.

4 Trains from last year probably should have had a trigger warning on it. Midnight's Dream probably should have had some too.
68
General Discussion / Re: The Role of Mental Health in Stuco
« Last post by halemcsharry on April 29, 2014, 12:09:33 am »
Quick question on the topic of trigger warnings: does anyone have an example of an element of a StuCo (or TI) show in recent years that should have warranted a trigger warning?

God of Carnage had vomiting but I think there was a warning for that? Bug, I think, had some content warnings.

Would a piece like Next to Normal require trigger warnings for topics of depression and attempted suicide? That's the only piece I can think of where someone might go into the theatre expecting something less intense than advertised. With Marat/Sade, on the other hand, I think one should have probably expected some freaky **** and some yelling just based on the posters and (amazing) promo video.
69
General Discussion / Re: The Culture of Casting/Petitioning
« Last post by halemcsharry on April 29, 2014, 12:04:35 am »
As someone who petitioned for boards twice last year and was rejected both times, it felt pretty awful to be barraged the Monday after deliberations with excitement about new board members and feel very left out. The vast majority of StuCo seem to be members of a board, but there are many members of our community who are not (whether by choice or not) and I worry that the overly "familial" attitude about boards excludes those members from feeling truly involved.

I agree with this sentiment (and identify with this experience.) There's no protocol for what to do when your petition is rejected- "be better?" "Work harder?" When there's no feedback or solid reasoning for rejection it means that there's no clear course of action, which is distressing.

And then there are people who will say "We got rejected by all these boards, so let's just start our own board!" And I think it's safe to say that the last thing NU theatre needs is an additional theatre board putting strain on resources.
70
General Discussion / Re: The Role of Mental Health in Stuco
« Last post by jschneidman11 on April 28, 2014, 08:35:32 pm »
I have a few unrelated thoughts on this topic.

1. I think Stuco needs to self-impose/police a tech week curfew. There's absolutely no reason why somebody needs to spend all night working in Shanley/Louis. We need to stigmatize staying up all night to make a show happen. It doesn't need to be that way. Another version of this is no freshman past a certain hour. My basic point is getting no sleep during a tech week should not be/is not a badge of honor, and I think a culture of taking care of oneself and prioritizing health needs to come from the upperclassmen. 

2. FBRs need to go. I am not on a board, but I would argue that they serve no function that could not be achieved by others. I understand the sense of "tradition" that this would eliminate, but I think that Stuco would be a far less scary place to a lot of freshmen if we did not denote a group of "cool kids" their first quarter here. Which leads to my next point...

3. StuCo's general social media presence is pretty focused on individual people and the "things" that they get. This needs to end. We create a culture of have and have nots, and make people sitting at their computer who didn't get the thing feel worthless.
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10